By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
killeryoshis said:
Mazty said:
killeryoshis said:
Mazty said:
killeryoshis said:
Mazty said:
Viper1 said:
Maelstrome said:
Mazty said:
Naum said:
Mazty said:
Well it's true - all the wii's I know are dust gatherers, not to mention, what does it have over the other 2 game consoles? Less power, less quality exclusives etc.

The best exlusive games ever created?

Maybe according to you, but not to any critic, or public vote.

 

the public voted for the wii with their wallets,it has some of the highest selling exclusives.

And the highest rated game of the generation.

Not according to metacritc - that title belongs to GTA4. A game which no less can't be played on the wii as it's hardware is hilariously arcahic.

And you have to take the critics bias into account - the games of the wii are never compared to their console brethren, otherwise graphics would always get at most a 6 or lower.

What I didn't know that?

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/ps3/grandtheftauto4

 


Next time click the link to my words instead of reading it. Super Mario galaxy is the highest rated game this generation at gamerankings.
As soon as Metacritc allows VGC on the list. Super mario galaxy will end up on top. Or atleast I think

 

As I said in another post though, the ratings for the wii are biased as graphically they should all be held back, but are not. It's lke saying that the SNES is a great console because it has Zelda: LTTP on, but nowadays, gamers expect more from their games than what it can provide.


So your saying graphics make good games? They can make me see what I'm doing. That's the point in graphics. If what you said
was true. Than Xbox was the best system last generation and the PS2 was the 2nd worst system last genration. Make a better
arguement. I can say that HD games focus too much on graphics and say they are biased.

No, technical improvement makes games better as you can refine an idea to be more like the reality you would want it to be e.g. compare GT1 to GT4.

The wii does nothing new or even well other than riding on the back of four games (Mario Galaxy, SSBB, NSMBW and Mario Karts), all which are fanboy titles and so would have been bought reguardless of quality. Mario Kart is a bad game as it has nothing to do with skill due to the blue shell, SSBB is just a cluster mess, NSMBW does nothing that LBP doesn't do better, but Mario Galaxy does look pretty good (only one I haven't played). I think something that says a lot about the wii is the amount of franchise titles on it and we all know franchise gaming = fanboys.