Kasz216 said:
| Hawk said:
::nod:: I won't argue that. I won't argue that content that normally would have been included on the disk or part of the core game could become 'bonus' or 'extra' content. Even if that is the case on a certain game, or even becomes the norm, I don't have a problem with that. As long as they follow the model of all that content being no charge to the person who bought the game new.
Kasz seemed to try to beat to death the notion that the 'extra' content is not, or will not be in future games, 'extra' content. Yeah, I get that, and see that could happen. But, in this model being used for BBC2, it doesn't matter either way to me, same game content or extra game content still will be no extra charge to the new game buyer.
I am all for a new game buyer just having to pay the new game price and nothing more and then the used game buyer having to pay the publisher/developer for portions of the game.
|
For directly right now... it can be used as a way to get around people like you who only cares about customer rights when it's your particular rights.
|
Yes, for directly right now my friend. I do not agree with your fighting a fair deal today, to make it favored for the consumer, just so that maybe possible future unfair moves by publishers/developers are less likely to happen.
And I am not sure what consumer right is being infringed? No one is forced to buy the deal before them. If paying for a game at a lower price, but without all the content someone gets when paying full price, is not good enough for you. You are free to not buy it.
