Akvod said:
But it's totally cool if Resident Evil 5 does it later than day 1, and asks money for it right? You guys and your weird psychology. You guys will be totally fine if the people who bought it new didn't get it for free, but everyone had to pay for it. |
Nope. If it's 1 day later it's still wrong. Basically it's wrong if A) it's obvious it could of been included with as much as a minor delay or... B) it's a feature that was previously standard. With this game BOTH qualfies. I'd say about 3 months is what i'd consider copastetic. Pay or not... it's wrong. Which you know... has been mentioned many many times but you keep ignoring it to keep up your bullshit strawman arguments to avoid the point that your arguement makes no sense.








