| joeorc said: yea does this sound like Sony expected the PS3 to sell more than the PS2 right from the start? "I'm aware that with all these technologies, the PS3 can't be offered at a price that's targeted towards households. I think everyone can still buy it if they wanted to," said Kutaragi to a mostly Japanese crowd. "But we're aiming for consumers throughout the world. So we're going to have to do our best [in containing the price]." this was back in 2005 before the PS3 released in 2006 that does not sound like they expected the PS3 to sell as well as the PS2 right from the start. the PS2 released for $300.00 the playstation 3 released for $500.00 and $600.00 there was quite an upgrade from the PS2 to the PS3 in hardware. for $200.00 the price was expensive, some buyer's think it was worth it other's did not, but it does not take someone being a rocket scientist to see that even Sony knew the price would be one of the thing's that would slow the sale's of the PS3. the very fact that it did sale pretty d@mn good for a $500.00 and $600.00 system is d@mn feat in of itself. |
Not d@mn good enough if they cut the price by a 3rd within 6 months of EU release and 12 months of US release. Oh and the PS3 was less than the PS2 launch price after 6 months not accounting for inflation. 430E vs 400. It was only significantly more expensive in America and perhaps Japan. Everywhere else I saw it had the PS3 at or cheaper than PS2 price at launch or soon after.
Thats with pretty similar prices so theres no argument that its got anything to do with launching too high. Its probably got more to do with the strong Wii sales and decent Xbox 360 sales as both systems got compelling content out the door much faster than Sony did with the PS3.
Do you know what its like to live on the far side of Uranus?
