I'm definitely a pro-choice person. There are enough unwanted kids clogging up the adoption system. If something happens, ie, birth control fails or whatnot, if you know you can't bring up a child now, then abort it. Don't risk your health, well-being, or whatever, because you HAVE to have a kid. Chances remain that you'll still have to give the kid up, further burdening the system. Not to mention there's a counter-quote from Clinton- "keep abortion safe, legal, and rare." If you make it illegal, people will still get them, and that's far more dangerous...
As for the question posed about the "right to take someone's life", it depends on when you define life. That's a different question, but for most of the pregnancy, it's still a sort of tumor in the woman's body. Said tumor does not become a life until seperated and self-sustained. I just can't buy that those 2 or 4 cells at conception is a seperate living being, since it's still in a parasitic stage, relying on the host (mother) to survive.
-dunno001
-On a quest for the truly perfect game; I don't think it exists...
