De85 said:
libellule said:
Netyaroze said:
Hmm the more complex the Physics the more dependend is your success on skills and also cars can have certain strengths and weaknesses which affect the car only if th calculation is based on a lot of parameters. This leads to a diverse carpool in the charts.
I wonder how GT5 will be in the end maybe thats why they need so much time because they try to make the physics and balancing as perfect as possible. |
well, the driving physics from the GT5 demo are already superior to FM3 driving physics according to most gtplanet/neogaff users.
I dont even need to mention the technical aspect where GT5 is ... also superior (more prettier cars on race)
|
Wow stop the presses! The users at gtplanet.com think that gran turismo is better than forza. Unbiased opinions ftw!
radha said:
@SecondWar
your comment is evidence that the game is not a driving simulator targeted at racing fans like turn 10 claimed at launch, but an arcade racer targeted at casual racing gamers(like you) and from a racing fan's point of view the game is crap. I havent played the game but was interest in it until now. |
Lol, just lol. I guess in a way it's at least semi-refreshing to see someone who doesn't mind wearing their bias right out there on their sleave...
edit: Wow, sources don't get any more authoritative than blogspot. If someone on there says the physics are crap then he must be right...
|
People at GTPlanet are adult Racing Sim lovers and they play everything (rFactor, LFS, GT5P) and a big bunch of them bought XBOX360 just for Forza 3. Most of them didn't love it not because they are in a GT fansite, but because they have high standards.
