By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Akvod said:
Chairman-Mao said:
It sucked ass crack. I know you can't compare every game to Modern Warfare but since they're both modern war shooters I think you can. The controls were clunkier, the graphics were average, the movement didn't seem as fluid (probably due to it being 20 fps, not 60 fps like MW2). The shooting wasn't great either. The snipers take multiple hits to kill someone, the RPG is non-lethal, several times I spawned with an enemy tank beside me, and there's more problems.

As much as I complain about MW2 it s a much better game then BC2.

Sorry you can't sprint and strafe at the same time.

If you want graphics, play Killzone 2.

Oh noes, I can't get 1 shot body kills, how dare they expect me to get headshots!

The RPG is extremely powerful. The splash is too big IMHO, as I've taken out entire groups of people with it. It's even awesome if I get a tracer on a sniper, and there's 2-3 other snipers right next to him.

 

 

1. The controls in Modern Warfare are better, admit it

2. I have Killzone 2 and the graphics are great. BC2 graphics looks like a launch title or something similar

3. It takes 2-3 body shots to kill with a sniper EVERY TIME which is totally ridiculous and unrealistic. I'm not saying it should be a one hit kill every time but when its 2 or 3 every time its insane.

4. I dunno maybe I'm bad with RPG but i put them pretty close to people and they didn't die.

5. You didn't say anything about the bad spawn system. I spawned several times with enemies and sometimes if I was lucky an enemy tank right near me ready to kill me. I know MW2 has a shit spawn system too but I would have thought DICE would see how bad MW2 spawns were and they would make a better one for a game coming out 5-6 months later.