Sony: PSN Is 'A Lot More Egalitarian' than Xbox Live

[r505Matt]

@WilliamWatts,
Yes.

@perpride,
# of active users IS important for an online community, especially when both companies talk about their systems being a social hub.


Overall, I don't like the way Dyer says stuff. It comes off as condescending. I love how Greenberg says "we will win in America" which is truth, and people bash him for it. Then Dyer just bashes the 360 in whatever way he can and people love it. I'm losing faith in this community as rationally thinking people.

I may seem to stand up for MS a lot, but that's because I generally defend the side getting attacked the most. Sony is glorified in some way for their mistakes, and MS is crucified for theirs. Where's the rationale in that?

OT: "So when people come to us, they can provide us with exclusive content and know that it's going to get to a lot more users because our machine has that hard drive. They don't have to create a lowest common denominator; they can do what they want it to do.”

I think not. So I guess Activision goes "Well, we sold almost 10 million copies of MW2 on 360, and just under 7 million on PS3, but all that matter is the hard-drive! Give exclusive content to Sony!". Since plenty of multi-plats sell better on Xbox 360, I'd imagine publishers would want exclusive content on the 360 over the PS3, this is assuming they want the content to be exclusive at all which is unlikely. What exclusive DLC is he talking about anyways?