By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Icyedge on 24 February 2010
Edit Thread
WilliamWatts said:
Icyedge said:
WilliamWatts said:

Online was very mediocre last generation however it reached maturity this generation. This generation will have a mediocre 3D experience but it will reach maturity next generation. Is that clearer? I was saying that just because its introduced now won't mean it'll be any good until next time around.

Are you advancing that it is the low number of titles that will deliver a mediocre 3D experience? If yes, I agree with you, it will be a slow start. Not sure mediocre is the right word tho. If not, you cant really compare online and 3D, online is always changing. Each days, each months, each years... But the 3D tech that is there on PC and coming on console will still be unchange in 5 years. The experience is far from being mediocre, LCD shutter glasses at 60 Hz per eyes will remain the highest quality 3D until we have glassless 3D.

Im talking about proper feature support, native 3D games, HD 3D display (rather than low resolution). We're there with movies however the current generation consoles were not built for 3D and they lack the performance to implement it properly. 3D can be done but not without major sacrafices for performance and resolution, next generation they can implement 3D much more efficiently and without the performance hit.

You know that theres already game in development that is 3D native and 720P.  Super stardust HD 3D should release with the 3D firmware, the development is almost finish. So it will not be mediocre 3D. But yes, theres performance issue, so I dont think will get to enjoy the big release in HD native 3D. The 3D HD titles will probably be PSN only title, but I still think mediocre is not the good word. The few games that will use it will do it well. Anyway im sure you get my point and I also understand yours.