By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hawk said:
jneul said:
This is bad, reviewers should be taught to give unbiased scores not based on their tastes of gaming, if there is nothing wrong with the game i.e. bugs, glitches, freezing, then there is no real reason to mark down as this much, from what I have played on so far it is not a game for everyone but to me it is a 9/10 game, can't wait until I can afford to but it.

I'm not looking for a report on how bug free games are in reviews.  I personally hope reviewers rate games on their enjoyment and fun factor. Which is subjective, yes.  So what I find valuable is finding a reviwer that fits my taste, and then I know they will give a fairly accurate rating compared to what I would.

I was just giving examples of what reviewers should mark down games for if they find evidence of the above mentioned things in a game. There are many more thing you should take into account like story,gameplay (unbiased view), graphics, and replay value



it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1