5 things that make BFBC2 better than MW2

[Xelloss]

oldschoolfool said:

Xelloss said:

I think it was lazy, there are a heck of a lot more reasons than 5 for why BF:BC2 is better than MW2.

MW2 has a slightly better perk/unlock system imo, that really acts like the cheese in a mouse-maze. Otherwise, BF:BC2 crushes it hands down in every other category.

BF:BC2 doesn't crush it hands down in every category. the tanks/helicopters and the destructable enviroments are the only things that BF:BC2 has over MW2. That's the only reason I'm getting the game. MW2 does everything else better,hands down in every category.

Negative.

MW2 is an OK game, with a really addictive perk/level system.

BF plays better, is deeper, and dont get me started on the technical aspects... and REALLY dont get me started on the multiplayer network features. BF Beta on PS3 played smoother, more reliably and with much lower latency than MW2 retail could dream of. BF uses dedicated servers, MW2 is epic lazyness and most time I play, you spend 30% or more of your time lagging on shit hosts, migrating hosts, or looking for new games because you had so many concurrent failhosts your lobby died. I am not talking about the PC deal here, where MW2 failed even harder - I am comparing ps3 to ps3.

MW2 is a FUN game, but IW games in general rely on the leveling/perk deal. They found a really good formula for getting people addicted, and yes MW2 was fun. But IW games cannot begin to touch DICE games in terms of overall quality or technical soundness.