Kantor said:
On looking at that link...he actually wouldn't be that bad. Other than the fact that he wants to abolish Social Security (seriously?) and teach "scientific evidence for creationism" in schools. |
Eliminating Social Security would just be the recognition that it is a system that is bankrupt. While there was some forethought about the eventual cost of the system, and it was designed to run a surplus which was meant to be saved for future spending, it has steadily been robed by politicians to pay for their promises; and now it is going to run very large (and growing) deficits for the rest of its existence.
On the subject of creationism, I personally don’t have a problem with schools teaching about creationism as long as it is presented in a religious/cultural context and not in a scientific context. Basically, if in a History/Social-Studies course you want to have a unit on the creation myths of several cultures I am happy with it, but I think it would be moronic to present it as a viable alternative to evolution.