megaman79 said:
Quoting for lulz.
Are you serious? Blair just testified 2 weeks ago and said "there was NO IMMINENT THREAT". |
Yeah because it's so funny you deal only with absolutes. Only you can be right on every issue. When you decide to look at said pictures, do what you must always do, and just close your eyes. WMD's were one of numerous reasons the U.N. had to attack Saddam's Regime under the Peace Treaty following the Iraq War. It would have been under the "Umbrella" of unity if France hadn't veto'd it. Gee, they didn't happen to be covering up a certain Oil For Food program, were they? Stop acting like you are coming from some moral high ground, when a tyrant who used chemical weapons on women and children has been removed. Ever look at the mass graves of people that were found in Iraq, that were obvious assasinations? Wasn't one of the main purposes of the U.N. to stand in the way of attrocities such as those perpetrated during WW2?