By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 20 February 2010
Edit Thread
NiKKoM said:
Kasz216 said:
NiKKoM said:

Cause they don't have then? :P Anyway more serious:

Cause they would destroy their own holy land..killing the occupants is something different then nuking it...

and the fact that the fallout would kill not only their own people but also their neigbours..

 

You'd be surprised Nuclear fallout stuff is actually pretty exagerrated.

Additionally you know... not only do they see Israel as in that "holy war"... but also the US, UK and in general NATO allies as the west that prop up Israel.  Hence why they fund terrorist cells that hit us as well. 


So why again wouldn't they say... Nuke the UK if they had the weapons?

In Islam retaliation (cause that would be the case for invading) is authorized to avenge an injury. However, the retaliation must be directed toward the guilty individual(s), must be proportional to the injury, and must not exceed the limits set by Allah. The Qur'an does not support substitutionary retaliation against individuals who are innocent of any offense... So unless the the entire population UK nuked so that Israel could get the land.. 

And of course their ballistic missiles can't get there... unless you believe Israel on their reports that Iran has build super missiles with super long range with the help of North Korea.. but I'm sure the Americans will spot them like the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq..

Your first paragraph is entirely irrelevent since as stated... the revolutionary guard doesn't follow the tenats of Islam.

Your second paragrah is also incorrect.... since it wouldn't take "super missles" to reach europe... and Iran themselves have tested and claimed to have missles that could reach Europe.  It's why the US missle shield is being moved in fact... to protect europe from Iran.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8498504.stm