Is there room for another WWII FPS?

[Winters]

Munkeh111 said:

Winters said:

As much as I love first person shooters, especially WW2, I just feel that we have played every battle there is to play. Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, Brothers in Arms, Battlefield 1942 and the other 100 that I could not be bothered to list. Many of us have at least played 2 or 3 different games which feature the same towns, same places, pretty forests and the like. With Modern Warfare 2, Battlefield Bad Comany 2, Ghost Recon 2 as well Crysis 2 shifting battle onto the "Digital Battlefield", I personally feel that I would not go back and buy another WWII FPS set in Europe though a would not mind a change of scenry, lets say Korea. CoD WaW tried a new angle, yet it felt too recycled.

Does anyone agree with me here?

 

There wasn't much war in Korea... do you just mean the Korean war? Becuase next CoD is rumoured to be set in Vietnam and other places in the Cold wary

I have had enough of WW II, maybe next gen we can get one more that really wows us, like CoD 2 did at the start of this gen

@Munkeh111

Indeed I meant the Korean war, it would at least be a change of scenery, CoD Vietnam..might be interesting if we could get a few B52s and carpet bomb the jungle, but I just feel that its not going to bring anything new to the game..a few different guns, not enough to convience me.