By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dahuman said:
Reasonable said:
I'll let you know when I get to play Alan Wake and evaluate what it does and why.

I'd advise people to remember you have to consider the aims of the engine/game. For example, in Alan Wake lighting is key, but, but the environments might be fairly statis, or the focus might be on open world vs linear flow, how many enemies onscreen are we talking? What is the focus on enemy AI complexity? All this has to be understood to really compare the results.

I could write some code which would look beautiful visually, particularly if I could have all static backgrounds, no physics and simply focus on rendering and lighting. Now, I'm not saying that is Alan Wake or Uncharted 2, but I am saying obvious similarities aside I see these as games that nonetheless have different goals which may mean very different underlying engines.

That's exactly why UC2 is the first console game to impress me.

Yeah, I have to admit the balance between great visuals, on-screen action, animation, physics, etc. in Uncharted 2 was pretty amazing and a real testement to the underlying engine they wrote.

I think Alan Wake looks to be a great technical achievement, too.  But I want to see more about how it juggles the various elements, and whether it sacrifices being great across the board to be superb in some areas and okay in others before I make any conclusions between the two.

 



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...