By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
megaman79 said:
sguy78 said:
megaman79 said:
sguy78 said:

So we should just leave Iraq, and Afganistan to themselves? We leave without allowing those countries to be ready when we do go, and we are looking at more of the same in a generation. Everything Obama is doing is trampling over the Constitution. Mandated Health Care is being shoved down our throats by him, trying to tell us it falls within the commerce clause. Not puchasing a product does not fall under commerce. This isn't even the point of the thread however, so please feel free to bring your tired talking points elsewhere.

No, thats correct. But you brought up politics as a motivation as to why you personally shouldn't believe the science. I simply wanted to demonstrate how similar your Democrat president was, thats all.

 

http://www.unep.org/COMPENDIUM2009/

Over 400 articles. Show me the proof that each of these research papers is wrong and i will change my mind.

 

Even better, show me the proof that they are right.

Every major scientific organisation in the world agrees that is happening. Even if you distrusted ALL of these sources you would have to atleast acknowledge that, in terms of odds, the huge number of research conclusions favours the other view anyway.

But no doubt you will not even believe this statistical argument.

@highwaystar. Relative to open and accountable science results, isn't that exactly what the EPA is doing in the US now?

While corporations are fighting the EPA, and trying to stop any attempt at measuring or acknowledging CO2 problems, the introduction of new laws will actually force a type of tax on these industries.

How can you be so sure that each and every one of those articles are not fabricated in one way or another? It's in scientist's best interest to proclaim, "The sky is falling, the sky is falling" in order to acquire more funding. It is not fact until it has been proven. Again, it is not fact until it is proven. Science.