CrazyHorse said:
I would disgree in the sense of this debate. 15 years in no where enough time to consider something to be truely indicative of climate change. There are far too many factors which will skew data over this sort of time period and so will not provide a true picture of how our climate is responding. Granted we may be able to start to spot trends but due to the the fact that weather systems vary each year 15 years worth of data isn't a great indication of climate. It takes centuries (and usually much longer) for the Earth to respond to changes to its system and so I'm not sure we can really classify 15 years as climate. |
If such is the case then we can never truley judge ANY climate change until it would likely be too late.