megaman79 said:
insomniac17 said:
megaman79 said:
Hey man, i didn't stereotype you with a label. But atleast now i know why your facts are wrong, right RIGHT?.
The problem with this thread, and you should know this by now sguy78, is that its always the same 4 or 5 people who post their views. They are ALWAYS the sceptics and they always end up finishing the conversation with the same circular arguments.
You haven't even complained that the thread is filled with people who agree with you? Well whats the point of the thread then?
|
You can hardly call their arguments circular. Prove that they are wrong. Give us evidence that shows that you are right. Then we'll believe you. Until that point, you can say that they're "circular" all you want, but it won't do anything. Debate people in this thread. Show us why you are right. I personally won't debate because I admit that I am not knowledgeable enough to make a convincing argument, but if you think that they aren't going anywhere with their arguments, explain why. Give facts to back you up. If you make a good argument, I'll believe you. But I agree with the skeptics, because in every single thread about global warming that I have read, they provide vast amounts of evidence to back up their arguments whereas most others have little or none.
|
Try and figure it out for yourself. Infact, try and follow the many links to their evidence, and then you can make your own conclusions.
I have actually bothered to do this, and whenever i try to disprove the legitimacy (or atleast allude to the potential bias) of this evidence i have gotten the same excuses from the same group of posters. You can't trust that science, but you can trust my science.
Well there is a s***load more science to refute on the side of CC evidence. As far as i can tell nobody has gotten anywhere proving all this wrong.
|
Your "science" is being proven to be false. Wake up. I'm not going to change my way of life, or be forced to do so based on what-ifs. Prove it, or it doesn't exist.
Essay Pro