By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
megaman79 on 19 February 2010
Edit Thread
insomniac17 said:
megaman79 said:

Hey man, i didn't stereotype you with a label. But atleast now i know why your facts are wrong, right RIGHT?.

The problem with this thread, and you should know this by now sguy78, is that its always the same 4 or 5 people who post their views. They are ALWAYS the sceptics and they always end up finishing the conversation with the same circular arguments.

You haven't even complained that the thread is filled with people who agree with you? Well whats the point of the thread then?

You can hardly call their arguments circular. Prove that they are wrong. Give us evidence that shows that you are right. Then we'll believe you. Until that point, you can say that they're "circular" all you want, but it won't do anything. Debate people in this thread. Show us why you are right. I personally won't debate because I admit that I am not knowledgeable enough to make a convincing argument, but if you think that they aren't going anywhere with their arguments, explain why. Give facts to back you up. If you make a good argument, I'll believe you. But I agree with the skeptics, because in every single thread about global warming that I have read, they provide vast amounts of evidence to back up their arguments whereas most others have little or none.

Try and figure it out for yourself. Infact, try and follow the many links to their evidence, and then you can make your own conclusions.

I have actually bothered to do this, and whenever i try to disprove the legitimacy (or atleast allude to the potential bias) of this evidence i have gotten the same excuses from the same group of posters. You can't trust that science, but you can trust my science.

Well there is a s***load more science to refute on the side of CC evidence. As far as i can tell nobody has gotten anywhere proving all this wrong.

 



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.