Zlejedi said: Do I need more proof than this article title to prove he is biased? http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/07/29/miracles-happen-gt300-tapes-out/ Seriously he puts common internet knowledge puts some secret "sources" into mix and try to pretend he has any information when at most he is making worst case scenario educated guess. |
Yeah, ignore the unfounded sensationalism. If you read his forum comments you'll see none of that (he's actually a nice guy), it's just to get readers. Just work with the facts and details. But what specific facts are you disputing? As in, precise claims about clocks or power or release date? I can't see where he's wrong yet.
Really, say what specifics you think are wrong. I can't argue against a strawman.
His GT300 tape out date was actually, at the time, very different from 'common internet knowledge'. The consensus was around BSN's date of January to March tapeout. Who was right? Charlie. If they'd actually had silicon in March we would have seen chips by now. Whereas Charlie has given precise dates and rationales for the A2 and A3 tapeouts too which are all consistent with the lack of chips and the release date of this March.