By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
cAPSLOCK said:
joeorc said:
Maneco said:
I think that what most upsets Nintendo console owners is the loss of exclusivity. Viewtiful Joe, Resident Evil 4, No More Heroes. If this is comes true before releasing Epic Mickey on Wii, you can be damn sure it won't sell on Wii, because their owners will boycott the game. I would, if this happened.

but that is the problem i think more an more gamer's are having this generation, you cannot loose something if you still get to play it on your system!

that's the point , if you can still play the game on the Wii why should it matter?

that's the big problem I see with this whole generation right from the start

the Wii lost this, the PS3 lost this the xbox360 lost this..

does anyone see a theme here, I could understand if the system does not get the game completely , or somewhat if you have to wait because of timed exclusivity but even  with Timed Exclusive you still get to play the game , well at least most of the time that is..

I just think many gamer's are blowing the said game system "lost exclusivity"  way out of proportion.

the only true exclusives you can count on is first party, and second 3rd party are freelance

beside's In my opinion the Wii has exclusive's in spade's

There's a real danger with a Wii losing its exclusive status, and that's how the game controls. Imagine if one of the HD twins ended up going multiplat with a Wii game and as a result those particular games always end up with shitty graphics.

That actually does happen with Wii games going multiplat. The control is almost always a pile of shit, the graphics almost always take a huge hit (I'm not talking PS3 level, I mean looking like a first year PS2 game).  I can't think of a single multiplat Wii game that has reached its full potential, can you?  Even Tiger Woods 2010, probably the best golf game ever thanks to WM+ has early PS2 graphics and suffers because of its multiplat status. 

Multiplat Wii and PC games always fail horribly in some category, which is definitely not the case with a lot of PS3/360 multiplat games. Same case with PC games going 360. I know before the game comes out the levels are going to be teeny tiny and there's going to be a lack of gameplay options and probably shitty graphics and baby scale so it's not worth the effort, at least not at anything above $9.99.

Are you saying that Nintendo 1st party Exclusive's are not enough ?

because Yes we as gamer's alway's want more game experiences, but that's just a fact of the way the entire game industry has moved toward, It come's down to the people that make the choice for how a game get's released are mostly the guy's at the head, most of your developer's just make the game, so if say Disney decides that it's more Money for Disney to bring the game over to other platform's that the head's of the company are going to do just that.

one can see that already:

just look at Final Fantasy XIII

GTA:IV being released on more system's at the same time that they have done right away. most of the time one system at a time.

So i can understand that what your saying is many time's true , but the developer's may not have a choice in the matter. they like to keep their job.



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.