Zucas said:
Well let's not sink the whole boat before we know we hit something. A composition fallacy is where you assert what is true of one part is true of the whole. Meaning, jsut becuase a little part like this may have come out, we can't assume the whole is false. It's a fallacy that a lot of people like to use to disprove god as they find something that disproves a part of stated existence of god and then use it to assert it as the whole disproval. Yes this is damning of the theory but it doesn't disprove the whole theory. As I said, let's wait for more data to be compiled or data that supercedes other data before we start making truth claims. Or basically, let's not make the same mistake Mr. Phil Jones made here. |
There is a real issue here though... since Phil Jones work is more or less the entire foundation of global warming research. His hockey stick method is basically the very fundamentals of global warming. If this actually is true... it pretty much does bring down the whole science and reset it to it's infancy.