By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Akvod on 18 February 2010
Edit Thread
Garnett said:
Akvod said:
Garnett said:
Akvod said:
Garnett said:
Akvod said:
Slimebeast said:
I agree with Garnett about the tank. I love the tank but there's not enuff of them for everybody.

That comic strip was funny.

If there was enuff of them for everybody, Battlefield would become a purely vehicular based game.

2 Stationary ATs, and Tracer+RPG is more than enough. The only thing left is just coordination.

Except when someone is camping in it with 2 guys repairing him.

 

 

Then let them take the first base. If you watch the video I'm going to post soon. The 3'rd base is a tank hell.

Not if there camping and have 2 guys repairing them.

 

 

Not if there's lots of RPGs, Stationary AT, and an Apache.

Not all of those will he attacking it at the same time. The RPGs dont do shit,the guy in the MG seat of the tank (who cant be killed yeah great work there DICE) will kill ANY infantry.

the stationary AT is useless if the tank is behind something and Apache RARELY hit there targets. Most of the time they get owned and even if they did hit there targets the guys repairing the tank would have it repaired in no time.

Cooperation, aim at the sides and backs (accomplished with tracers), you can direct the missiles on the AT, if you're half decent you should hit the tank with the Apache (splash damage WILL kill the engineers repairing outside the tank).

 

IDK, from what I'm getting, most of your comments are simply that you can't take on a tank BY YOURSELF. Of course you can't, that's precisely why a tank is such a huge advantage. Don't get me wrong, 1 Tank>1 infantry.

That's why TEAM WORK is so important. One man can't destroy a decently piloted tank (unless they stealth with a C4).

You can't own at this game BY YOURSELF. You NEED to work TOGETHER.