Akvod said:
Garnett said:
Akvod said:
Garnett said:
Akvod said:
Slimebeast said: I agree with Garnett about the tank. I love the tank but there's not enuff of them for everybody.
That comic strip was funny. |
If there was enuff of them for everybody, Battlefield would become a purely vehicular based game.
2 Stationary ATs, and Tracer+RPG is more than enough. The only thing left is just coordination.
|
Except when someone is camping in it with 2 guys repairing him.
|
Then let them take the first base. If you watch the video I'm going to post soon. The 3'rd base is a tank hell.
|
Not if there camping and have 2 guys repairing them.
|
Not if there's lots of RPGs, Stationary AT, and an Apache.
|
Not all of those will he attacking it at the same time. The RPGs dont do shit,the guy in the MG seat of the tank (who cant be killed yeah great work there DICE) will kill ANY infantry.
the stationary AT is useless if the tank is behind something and Apache RARELY hit there targets. Most of the time they get owned and even if they did hit there targets the guys repairing the tank would have it repaired in no time.