By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Also... I'll just say this.

Any science that doesn't have numbers that are shown to the people are in fact not science...

If you aren't willing to produce your numbers you aren't a scientist... and what you produce isn't science.

It's no better then religion, and actually fairly worse in a number of ways.

 

The problem with Phil Jones is that he swears he believes in things 100% while still mentioning that these things are not statistically signficant in the data.

 

Which, as anyone who's had a basic science class should be able to tell you... if it's not statistically significant you haven't disproven the null hypothesis.

So... you definitly shouldn't believe in it 100% hell you shouldn't even believe in it 50%. 

 

In otherwords.  Phil Jones is no real scientist.