Also... I'll just say this.
Any science that doesn't have numbers that are shown to the people are in fact not science...
If you aren't willing to produce your numbers you aren't a scientist... and what you produce isn't science.
It's no better then religion, and actually fairly worse in a number of ways.
The problem with Phil Jones is that he swears he believes in things 100% while still mentioning that these things are not statistically signficant in the data.
Which, as anyone who's had a basic science class should be able to tell you... if it's not statistically significant you haven't disproven the null hypothesis.
So... you definitly shouldn't believe in it 100% hell you shouldn't even believe in it 50%.
In otherwords. Phil Jones is no real scientist.