FaRmLaNd on 18 February 2010
Very fascinating.
It always perplexed me as to why so many freedom of information requests were seemingly being rejected and to be honest the (you're a sceptic you shouldn't have access to the data) excuse wasn't a very relevant one. I mean science thrives on scepticism.
Someone with such poor organisational skills should never have been in the position he was.
Maybe they should gather some new raw data? Because without the raw data is does discredit them significantly. Even if the raw data was found and vindicated the pro human climate change science this scientest should never have anything to do with it again.
Essay Pro