Just wanted to point something out here. I've noticed many people, not only here, but on many other websites critizise Halo for being..well Halo. High jumping, no sprinting, too colorful, fake weapons, ectetera ectetera. Many compare it to Call of Duty and Killzone 2 a lot and im not liking it. Not to sound like a Halo fanboy, and trust me I LOVE HALO, but it doesnt need to be like any other experience thats not Halo. People say that Halo should play like this game and that game, or that its not a graphical powerhouse like Sony's shooter, or its not as real as Call of Duty, or I hate that they dont change this aspect of it, and so on.
Halo is a sci fi First Person Shooter. People can say they dont like it, but shouldnt deny that its a good game and a good series and the first Halo game in the series revolutionized the FPS genre on a console as we know it. Its not supposed to be all graphics, not to say Killzone was nothing but graphics. I have Killzone and love it. Its just that I believe gameplay is more important than graphics, unless its a Wii game were talking about. Halo doesnt need great graphics, just good enough graphics. I barely hear anybody complain about the online and campaign anyway. Halo started as a Sci fi game and thats what its always been. Now games like Modern Warfare and Bad Company are making people say, We dont wanna use Plasma grenades and Needler guns cause its not real. Come on, its Halo.
Im just speaking my mind on this so please excuse the disappointment. Im just saying that Halo will be Halo so just enjoy what it is. I know Reach will add some things like sprinting (like COD and almost every other shooter has), but thats okay. Just leave everything else out unless it fits in the Halo universe. What do y'all the coomunity think on this issue. Do u agree? Lets speak on it.
Essay Pro