By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
richardhutnik on 18 February 2010
Edit Thread
wholikeswood said:
Seece said:
wholikeswood said:
Seece said:
wholikeswood said:
Seece said:
Oh for god sakes, you're so transparant, anything to take a dig at Microsoft.

Blame Capcom if you want to blame anyone, they could put this on the bluray disc and offer it as free OR paid DLC on Xbox live but no ...

It was Capcom I was blaming.

As starcraft said, it's relatively inexpensive to spread a game over 2 DVDs so, regardless of whether Capcom were too cheap to use a second or too greedy not to go down the 'pay us $60 for the disc now... and $10 again down the' road (or both!), they've still compromised the game's experience off-the-shelf and that angers me as I got quite hyped for purchasing after trying out the demo.

This had nothing to do with taking a dig at Microsoft or the DVD format, yet predictably you tried to spin it as such. Urgh.

Bullshit, you only posted this because it puts the Xbox in bad light, you're the predictable one.

But it puts Capcom in a bad light (for being cheap, greedy, or both) and that's who I'm complaing about, don't you see?

(Well, clearly you don't; you have your head down, charging at me - "wholikeswood be trollin' Microsoft grrrrr!!!!111". Yawn...)

Don't be playing all innocent and naive. It put's them both in a bad light, you're one of a few posters on this site that will post anti Microsoft news any chance they get, this isn't any different.

Looking at the threads I've created for the past 6 months, I see just one topic that was Microsoft-critical and that was a hands-on with ODST back in September that described the game as "underwhelming" and indeed the game wound up with a Metascore of 83 (and criticism for providing a 5 hour campaign, just 3 new multiplayer maps, and a horde mode - all for the price of a full game), so the article was hardly far off the mark.

This thread is about Capcom, not Microsoft, so let's not derail it. Chilled!

When you specifically post this like: "Capcom has publically lamented having to cut large amounts of content from Lost Planet 2 in order to fit it onto the Xbox 360’s piddling DVD capacity without the game turning into a swapfest, but promises users will be able to buy everything they cut as DLC" what you write about isn't about Capcom alone, it is about how the XBox 360 cost the PS3 owners a full game experience.  It becomes about Microsoft.  If you do want to quote something, and have it focus specifically on that part, DON'T quote parts from an article... unless you also comment about that part being biased.  You do want this thread to also debate the disk capacities of the 360, even while you deny it now.  Oh, you cloak it in what Capcom says, but you really want that to be a bashing of the 360 platform.  And considering how this thread has gone, you have accomplished your mission.