How relevant is a review score to you gamers?

[Kenryoku_Maxis]

MontanaHatchet said:

Kenryoku_Maxis said:
As I've been trying to tell people for years, you don't need to listen to reviewers at all. There's way too many resources on the internet and way too many ways for you to judge a game yourself, even before playing it, to allow yourself to simply let some guy with their own bias and opinions to tell you whether or not to buy a game. Because at the end of the day, that's what you are going to a review site looking for, the justification for your purchase, and these review sites know it. So why should we give them an ear at all? Why should we care if they gave a game a 8.8 or 9.8?

In the end, you could have looked up hours of videos of the actual gameplay on various sites (gametrailers, youtube, etc) or read up on the game from actual news sites that don't focus on reviews. If you just focus on the review, you're basically just saying 'IGN/Gamespot/kotaku/etc, tell me what I should play'.

So you should get opinions about games from sources that don't have opinions?

I mean...yeah. People read reviews because they want to get different opinions about a game. You're acting like that's a crime. And those sites aren't telling you what to buy, just what they think is good. But then again, it's probably pointless to point out the obvious here.

Back 10 years ago when there was limited resources and few people had access to the internet, things like Magazine reviews and even limited online reviews like IGN were somewhat necessary, because people didn't have access to simply going online and seeing all the news articles and footage of a game before release.  Now adays however, review sites are pretty much just a luxury, even obsolete, in a world where we have nearly all the same access to the resources of the reviewers themselves.  Heck, aside from 'high profile' games, many times we even end up getting the games before major sites and magazines even review them, if they review them at all.  I had Muramasa: The Demon Blade 2 weeks before it was reviewed.  And Dragon Ball: Revenge of King Picollo a month before it was reviewed on IGN.

So what's the point of reading reviews?  They tend to just focus on high profile games, have bias to certain types of games and try to bend their reviews towards the whims of the masses.  As I said before, I can simply go on youtube or gametrailers and get a better sense of what a game is like than waiting near launch and trying to figure out what a reviewer wants me to think through a review.