By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WilliamWatts said:

DX9 Results: 1920x1200, No AA, Game Quality: Enthusiast
---- Avg. FPS ----- Username ------ CPU/Speed ------------- GPU/OC ------------ OS
26.48 fps -- elementskater706 -- Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz -- 4870 1GB, 830/950 -- Vista 64 SP1

DX10 Results: 1920x1200, No AA, Game Quality: Enthusiast
---- Avg. FPS ----- Username ------ CPU/Speed ------------- GPU/OC ------------ OS
22.67 fps -- elementskater706 -- Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz -- 4870 1GB, 830/950 -- Vista 64 SP1

http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/463724-crysis-warhead-benchmark-results.html

If you're spending that much money on a system you may as well get the graphics card which can 'max out' the game. Which was my point, I felt the 4xAA compensated for the fact it wasn't being run on enthusiast settings.

Currently, no video card can "max out" Crysis. Seriously, that game brings even a 5970 to its knees at max settings.

That said, you should be able to get playable framerates in Crysis/Warhead on High, at the very least, which is all you can ask without blowing $400+ on a video card that'll be obsolete in three years anyway.



"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."

 -Sean Malstrom