sapphi_snake said:
Or... Join the army, visit Iraq, show your bravery, proove that you're a man, live an exciting life, "protect" your country, kill "terrorists", be a "hero", reinlist after you come back home cause civilian life is just way too boring, return to Iraq whith rock music in the background, be a badass.
|
Yes, because everyone wants to become disenchanted with their own family. That's really a great upside of war. There aren't thousands of stories of people coming back from a warzone and not being able to cope with civilian life.
Where you see a badass going back to war, I see a man who has lost the ability to operate in civilian life and chose the enemy he knew over the enemy he didn't understand. It's a tragedy what these young soldiers go through and how it effects them for the rest of their lives and the movie did a pretty damned good job of showing it.
Still think you're right? Here's a quote from Bigelow herself:
"I always want to make films. I think of it as a great opportunity to comment on the world in which we live. Perhaps just because I just came off The Hurt Locker (2008) and I'm thinking of the war and I think it's a deplorable situation. It's a great medium in which to speak about that. This is a war that cannot be won, why are we sending troops over there? Well, the only medium I have, the only opportunity I have, is to use film. There will always be issues I care about."
Still want to ramble on about how The Hurt Locker is a propaganda film? Shit, just the fact that the movie is directed by the same person that did Strange Days should have been enough of a clue that Bigelow would never create a pro-war movie.
On a funny side note, I just noticed that Bigelow is competing against her former spouse (Cameron) for Best Picture. Interesting.
Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/