Currently Online 
sc94597 on 12 February 2010
| Zucas said: Seece is right, the punishment doesn't fit the crime. He should be paying back the entire amount he took from Nintendo rather than a portion. Despite that misleading intro, I think he should have to pay Nintendo back everything they loss. Considering he only has to pay $1.5 million of that $5 million, he's getting a pretty good deal. But his attempt to try and slant his story pretty much shows what kind of person this guy is. At least man up to what ya did. |
Either way he won't be able to pay back either amount. So it doesn't really matter. Then there is the issue of him being 1 of 50,001 people participating in this crime. Very disproportional don't you think? Obviously these methods of trying to make up for lost ground by suing people by ridiculous amounts aren't working, and another solution should be found. The way some of you are going about this, I hope that you think everybody who steals should get their hand chopped of because "eye for an eye" isn't how the legal system should work, especially so when it is disproportional in the punishers side when you disregard the other 50,000 people participating in the crime just because they can't be caught.
