Blue3 said:
Whats your point ? Wii fanboy rant - "a week or so ago a Microsoft exec claimed that the Wii was weaker then the X-Box. Now that is an illegal claim considering it is comming from an official competitor its slander and that is a crime" I was just showing him how the MS exec was techincly correct, the Wii is weaker then the Xbox.
|
My point is that just because that part of x-box is technically stronger than wii doesn't mean the overall match-up is the same thing. The way all systems are set-up currently stating one fact doesn't show it's superiority. That kind of argument is more appropriate for the days of the bit era. Before you could simply say this system cpu can do 16 megabytes so it has better graphics than that 8 megabyte system.
If you were to use an argument like that you could say the N64 could do better graphics than x-box, because x-box was using around 32 while n64 was 64. Things today are hotwired to many different parts. There is no one number you can throw out there to measure a system's power.
