By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Darth Naner said:
Gah. Gamers are often too stubborn. They complain when Mario's story isn't more than "Go rescue the Princess and shut up" and complain when Metroid's story is all elaborate and such.

One thing you all must understand is that you can't wish for Metroid to not have a story: It already has one. Not the most original one at first glance, but full of details and beautiful when seen with more depht.

And why does, suddenly, more story automatically relate to lack of gameplay? Even if you say an established story means forced linearity, there are games (Metroid games include in this, though not so deeply... yet) that have multiple endings depending on how you play the game, with one being the real ending that leads to sequels and others being alternate endings that relate to your progress through the game.

Finally, I don't see how cutscenes can create a bad game. Metal Gear Solid 4 and Uncharted 2 are full of them (quite more than what I've ever seen in a Nintendo game) and they both got many Game of the Year awards...

I think you are missing the primary point that several people are worried about.  Metroid has been about shooting Space Aliens in a non-linear world.  Sakamoto is not talking about the gameplay at all-- all he is talking about is exploring Samus's background or her 'Maternal instincts as a woman'.  Samus is just the Avatar to the game world in the Metroid games-- very few, if any, have ever cared about Samus other than the fact she was our connection to the gameworld.

 

Sakamoto was also behind Fusion-- the only Metroid game that tried to force a story on the player (admitingly, a small story, but a story none the less).  Fusion was the most linear metroid game ever, and is considered by many, myself included, to be the worst entry in the series (save for perhaps Zero Mission-- also created by Sakamoto).  You ask why adding more story means something is  taken away from gameplay-- past experience tells us that this is most likely the case, and Sakamoto has shown to be a particurarly bad offender in this area (again, look at Fusion). 

Cutscenes can ruin a game-- I hated Final Fantasy X because it seems like all I ever did was play for two minutes then watch a two minute cutscene, repeat.  Very boring.  I also can't get into those games you mentioned (Metal Gear Solid 4 and Uncharted 2) for the same reasons-- I hate the number of cut scenes and they take away from the gameplay for me. 

Please note I am not saying Fusion was a bad game (I enjoyed it), but it was a bad Metroid game.  I am also not saying Other M will be a bad game-- it could be the greatest game ever.  I am saying, as others are, that based on past experience it looks like Other M is going to sacrifice great Metroid gameplay for a story.  I hope I am wrong, but I am not optomistic.