Sonic Games are met with unfair bias

[disolitude]

Fei-Hung said:
I think Sonic went wrong when they introduced boring and horrible playeable characters. i dont want to play as Big cat thingy or a frog or rose or some other odd character.

Sonic should be kept to Sonic or at Sonic, Tails and Knuckles. How can you have other characters as fast as Sonic? It just doesnt make any sense. If Sega concentrated more on Sonic and less on new and shite characters, they would have been much better off.

I think what infuriates critics and other gamers is the samething- Sega have the concept to make a great Sonic game e.g. Sonic Unleashed, but then spoil it by putting in crappy werehog stages. Sega needs to understand, people like Sonic for Sonic gameplay. To make a successful Sonic game, this is all they need to do. Stick with Sonic, put in lots of great Sonic levels designed around speed (make sure you include a pinball stage), bonus levels and the ability to become Super Sonic and kick some serious ass at Light Speeds!

I think the cahracters are fine. I mean in Sonic Adventure you have a 5-6 hour sonic campaign, 4 hours for Tails, 4 hours for Knuckles. That right there is usually enought to justify the price of the game.

By the time you get to the big cat, which is meant as a fishing bonus game...you've got your moneys worth.

What I'm saying is, more gameplay is good, but it needs to be good gameplay.