MontanaHatchet said:
The netcode needs some work (and so does the multiplayer), but frankly, it's not that bad. At least Epic tries. That's more than I can say for Infinity Ward. And I seriously doubt you've played the series in a while, because you couldn't be any more wrong. But if you're so sure in what you say, please name me a third person shooter on the 360 that's comparable to Gears 2 in graphics, gameplay, whatever. I'll wait. |
I'm not talking about graphics. It's pretty enough. I'm not a big graphics guy, though. *shrug*
Gears 1 elevated the genre a bit, though it got some bonus credit for being the first real next-gen big hype franchise at a time when gamers needed one.
Everything from 50 Cent Blood on the Sand to Mass Effect 2 have taken the mechanics and replicated them to a pretty fair comparison. Everyone does cover now. Everyone does co-op. Everyone does vehicle/turret stuff to break up the on-foot shooting. There's nothing that special about Gears combat. It really is fairly standard shooter stuff. The story's nothing special - there's 200k fans wanting to know what happens next, but no one's really too hung up on the plot. The character's are punchlines and caricatures.
Gears 2 just didn't really innovate in any measurable way - especially, as we agreed, in the multiplayer mode.
I'll admit I am biased toward FPS over 3PS, but even so - - it's fun enough to play through, but so are lots of games.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not in any way arguing that Gears 2 is a bad game. I liked it well enough. It's just my opinion that it's not a strong enough series overall to be mentioned with the elite franchises in any way except graphic quality.