Hisiru said:
My point is: We don't have official numbers (solid numbers), so we can't be sure. Nothing on that link will prove that vgchartz is wrong and the game is overtracked. You can only make guesses and nothing more but you won't find anything there to support your argument because "over 2M" can be anything, it's very inconsistent. Why would they claim "2.5m"? Just because it's nicer or what? I don't see your point. It's like if you say "it's over 5" and I say "so it's probably 6 or 7 because if it was 8 you would claim 8", it's very inconsistent. |
No we dont have any official numbers, but i can do a calculated guess. Im not trying to prove VGC wrong since they're also doing calculated guesses, all im saying is that if VGC has numbers showing 2.4m copies sold, the game itself must have shipped about 2.5m copies.
And logic states that when boasting numbers one always round up, so if they got 2.5m, they'll announce "over 2.5m". They wont go; "Oh look at that, we broke the 2m barrier 2 months ago.. lets do a press release." They're boasting numbers and logic, once again, tells us that they most likely did that when they shipped the last bach of games that took them past 2m.
----
