Kantor said:
That's because the component scores aren't all equally important, so an average is illogical. Also, component scores can only be given to multiples of 0.5, and many games are better than the sum of their parts- on paper, they don't sound great, but "fun", the most important part of the game, is too subjective to have its own sub-category. |
I wonder sometimes if IGN shouldn't just go to a weighted average with their review scores, everyone averages it anyway. At least then they could do it the way they want to and wouldn't get flamed by all the people who can't even be arsed to read (not an average), come on! It's 3 words!









