Miguel_Zorro said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
Miguel_Zorro said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
Miguel_Zorro said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
@Miguel- sorry the post has to be exactly above the post you made, does not count. |
LOL, seriously?
|
Hmm? maybe i worded that wrong, your post has to be exactly BELOW, the poster who made the same vote, there that sounded more correct.
Disregard my first one to avoid confusion.
|
It was the way you've been making up rules on the fly that's confusing. Later.
"Stacking Votes - Stacking votes happens when who ever votes last and your vote is identical to the voter above you, this counts as an extra +1 and -2."
|
Thats what i said...
gawd, if someone posts "X" vote and your "X" vote is the same, (Meaning after the person posts first you posts again right under that person) then and only then it counts, i never changed that rule, and i've been counting vote by that rule for people who have done so.
And yours did not count since it wasn't directly under dark's post.
If you don't like the way i run this thing, then kindly stop voting now.
|
It says "identical to the voter above you", which is not the same as "identical to the voter above you, with no posts in between". My vote was identical to the the person who voted last. The fact that there were unrelated non-voting posts in-between doesn't change that.
.. and when I said "Later", that meant that I no longer plan to participate. Happy voting.
|
I didn't mention that because i thought it would be obvious, i'll be sure next time to be specific on what the rules are.
So your going to stop voting because you dont agree with a very simple misunderstanding? pfft, w/e your choice. suppose i'll edit it to people who think the way you do, though granted, you are the first...
