pastro243 said:
freebs2 said:
pastro243 said:
freebs2 said:
Half Life 2 for the first place= I can agree with that
No Metroid Prime in the list= Blasphemy!
Uncharted 2 =doesn't deserve to be on the list
|
Why not? It got a lot of critical acclaim.
|
How can they judge the importance of a game in a decade when it's only been out for 2 months? and beside that I don't agree with all the critical acclaim it has got. It's a game with gorgeus graphics and presentation but beside that it hasn't got anything that I haven't seen in other games before and it's also too repetitive in my opinion. Lots of games deserve a lot more to be on that list, -there isn't even Resident Evil4- I even preferred Jak2 also made by naughty dog instead
|
Well, they are not judging importance, they can obvously say if they think its a better game than the rest of the games just after they play it, doesnt have to have anything new if its well executed to be better than other games, and its IGNs list so they can give the order they want, after all I dont consider any game on their lists(except maybe wii sports) to be a bad game.
|
An unoriginal game may be a good game but after I played gears of war 1, gears2, uncharted1 another carbon copy game it's starting to get boring while when I've played Resident Evil 4 for example it was a totally new and mind blowing experience. They are reviewers not famboys they should be objective when they make this statements, not just following their personal tastes at the moment they have written the article. Giving such high-scores to games like uncharted2 and CODMW2 legitimate developers for not trying to innovate their games, look at what's happening to Dead Space 2 for example, EA has already told it will be more like uncharted and modern warfare.Whith this trend, in a few years there will be only carbon copy action games and FPSs.
