PS3 performing better than PS1?!

[Falcon095]

gamings_best said:

Falcon095 said:

So what you are saying is that the PS3 is better for shooters than the X360?

So crating a machine that has made them lose bilions and have made them spend the profits of the PS1 and even of the PS2 was good for the company? And what if the PS3 was a disappointing for somebody who loved the PS1 and the PS2?

1- ps3 is more hardcore with it's shooters, that's really a personal prefrence.

2- if it benefits them in the long run why not,

3- and it sucks for those people, they got the wii and 360 to surfice though so I don't see the problem

What do you mean by "hardcore" and how's the PS3 more harcore with it's shooters?

But how is losing many billions good for them? Unless Sony intentionally spended those billions (which I don't see very likely), I don't see how is that gonna benefit them

How it sucks for those people? I'd say it sucks for Sony because they bought the competition product, and if that's the case then there is a problem because it means that Sony did not do the right thing with the PS3, which was the point that was being discussed