BladeOfGod said:
Kasz216 said:
BladeOfGod said:
NJ5 said:
BMaker11 said:
It can't possibly be outperforming the PS1. PS3 is domed, after all |
Your first sentence is correct, the second one is not.
|
are you willing to make a bet that if PS3 lasts on market for 10 years it will outsell PS1?
|
That is an irrelevent statment.
PS3 could sell 50 million consoles tommorrow because a Saudi trillionaire had a stroke...
It still wouldn't change the fact that the PS3 is not outperforming the PS1... or even performing to it's level... at current. Which you know... is what the thread is about.
It's like saying "Switzerland can't beat the US in a war." True now... and it's still true now... no matter how much stronger Switzerland gets or weaker the USA is.
|
If PS3 sells more in 10 years than PS1 in 10 years it means it outperformed PS1. Period.
No spinning crap like launch dates in Japan and US and price comprassion. Are you willing to make a bet?
|
Which is still irrelevent.
What he said was "It can't possibly be outperforming the PS3" present tense.
It in fact is not currently outperforming the PS1 or even performing on an even level with it.
Also, I don't make bets. I find them juvenile.
The PS3 isn't and hasn't outperformed the PS1. Period. Whether it does or not in the future is irrelevent.
Which you know... is what i posted in the post you replied too... which makes your reply that much stranger.
