Wyrdness said:
The GBA was still selling well when the DS arrived and on top of that the GBA had a new model coming which was the GB micro when the DS was on the way so your argument holds no ground in that respect, on top of that read my post clearly I said if the is new hardware not that it will be. You'll also find that every console never reaches it's full potential even when it's successor is on the way. Gold and Silver were introduced with the GBC and another gen of pokemon and was backwards compatible with the previous hardware who says the next can't be the same. |
Yes the GBA was selling well when Nintendo announced the DS. They also announced that it was a third pillar and let's not forget that the Gamecube was not selling as well as Nintendo had hoped. However this situation is different. The Wii is selling exceptionally well and so is the DS. No third pillar is needed. Nor is a successor to the DS. All Nintendo needs to do is focus on software. Once the sales of the Wii and DS begin to decline and price cuts and bundles will no longer matter then the introduction of New hardware is needed but let's not get ahead of ourselves. The DSi XL has not been relesed in the West and that will boost the sales of the DS, as I previously stated.
Note: Nintendo also had their Online network setup and wanted to take advantage of this new technology, which was becoming a standard. The GBA could not utilize it. Therefore new Technology had to be developed. There's no new technology that requires a DS2 to make use of it.
As for consoles reaching their potential, I think Sony and Nintendo have both gotten as much potential as they could from the PSX, PS2, and the Gameboy. Eventually systems must die becasue technology has moved on and the consumers have moved on also.
If Nintendo is successful at the moment, it’s because they are good, and I cannot blame them for that. What we should do is try to be just as good.----Laurent Benadiba