BladeOfGod said:
Kasz216 said:
Bamboleo said:
BladeOfGod said:
NiKKoM said:
jneul said:
BladeOfGod said:
Cool, if PS3 can stay on market for 10 years like PS1, it will sel over 100 million consoles |
i have also pointed this out to other people and they called me a retard, lol, some people are just denying the power of the ps brand
|
Some people are denying kasz posts... >_>
|
Kazs always comes to positive PS3 sales thread to ruin it.
He said that PS1 was launched in US and Europe 1 year after it was launched in Japan and thats correct. However, he ignored the fact that PS1 was 299$ on its launch and PS3 was 599$ on its launch.He also ignored the fact that PS1 was launched before its competitors that PS3 was launched AFTER its competitor
|
And you're ignoring the fact that PS1 launch price of 299$ back in 1995 was much more money than 299$ nowadays.
|
True, but not really. Even adjusting for inflation PS3 cost way more at launch. Let me see if i can find the chart and edit it in.
Can't get a good picture of it and upload it but here's the article.
http://curmudgeongamer.com/2006/05/history-of-console-prices-or-500-aint.html
PS1 was only about 350 compaired to the PS3's price. 500-600.
|
So no matter how you try to spin it, PS3 was MORE EXPENISVE on its launch than PS1.
|
Yep. Though I wouldn't call inflation Spin.
Also fun note. PS3 was cheaper at Launch then the Atari 2600.
