Kasz216 said:
SpartanFX said:
Kasz216 said:
SpartanFX said:
Kasz216 said:
--OkeyDokey-- said:
Kasz216 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Kasz216 said:
You don't seem to be getting it. Eurogamer wouldn't have the same opinion of "epicness" were this game called GOW3.
There is a reason why companies pay money to color margarine yellow even though it doesn't change the taste any.
|
See, God of War is awesome.
DI copied God of War, but didn't meet the high standards of the series.
Hence DI got burned by reviewers..
|
No DI got burned because it wasn't GOW despite being an exact copy. pretty much every review i've seen says something along the lines of "it copies everything from GOW yet for some reason isn't nearly as fun." You give people two identical wines, but change the bottles and they will report a dinstict difference in taste. |
I expect more from you. Being a complete ripoff doesn't make it equal in quality.
|
No, but that's basically the quotes that were written... and even inferior products can outshine superior ones with the right branding.
Most people would enjoy DI more if they called it GOW: Something and reskinned everyone to look like Greek characters... this is my point.
The quality of DI is irrelevant since all the negativity that was on it since it's announcement has made the game somewhat toxic to reviewers giving it a high score.
Good/bad it was never going to get AAA scores due to it's branding and due to all the pre-negativity.
|
no these are all your assumption that if it was called god of war it would have got a better score.The weapon is fukin slow and lame(hammer thing) in the game.that's one big no no in god of war genre.
nothing about it even outshines god of war 1 and 2 let alone 3.
so you are just assuming without even playing the game.
wasn't dead space called a resident evil rip off and it still got 89 on meta(better than RE5)??it got the score becasue despite being a copy it out shined RE in some aspects but not dante's inferno.
|
It's not really an assumption. It's basic consumer science.
The God of War brand has value wouldn't you say?
|
not as much as resident evil franchise.dead space over came that brand name....why???( I know why i just want you to tell me whjy all of a sudden reviewers are harsh on dante and not on dead space)
|
Well for one... I didn't hear too many people compairing the games. Not like DI and GOW anyway.
It used the same over the shoulder gameplay but the setting being in space and aliens vs zombies... was much more distant then Greek/christian things.
It did a lot different from RE4.
Two... different brands hold different amounts of value. Just because you have the better brand doesn't mean your DEFINITLY going to come out on top... however it is going to negativly impact you.
Also finally. RE5 used an annoying co-op almost needed mode with an AI buddy. AI buddys are bad even compaired to the worst players... hence the issues with RE5. Also while fun games... RE5 weren't exactly master storytellers with amazing dialgoue or anything and Deadspace was seen to have improved on that.
Not that GOW is masterful storytelling or dialogue... it's just fairly servicible.... though I'm sure DI is also fairly servicable and not making huge strides.
|
RE and dead space had different setting but their mechanism was pretty simillar butttt dead space improved the mechanism (walking while aiming,better/scarier setting,..)
dante doesn't do anything better than god of war.it's slower(main weapon sucks ass), graphics are not that great for its time,not as epic in scale .in conclusion it's a good game but it doesnot touch god of war let alone outshinig it.hence all of revieweres mentioned that it was worse than god fo war.not all reviewwrs can not become god of war fanboys all of a sudden.they are just expressing the truth.
