Kasz216 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Kasz216 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Kasz216 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Kasz216 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Kasz216 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Barozi said:
It's getting good reviews and is a must have for any die hard fan of the genre.
You're just a GoW fan. Nothing more and nothing less. |
I am gonna get the game, but only when its cheap...
What I'm saying is that I knew this game would not live upto its potential review wise because its copying a major franchise, and that would lead to obvious comparisions between that major franchise.
What the hell gives you the right to label me as "just a God of War fan" ?
|
If I had to guess i'd say your somehwat perverse joy over a game getting average review scores just so it doesn't challenge God of War.
Even if I did predict a game was going to get medicore review scores... happy really doesn't seem like the proper response... let alone so happy that a thread needs to be made.
I can't speak for him, but that's what gave me that impression.
|
Happy ? I am actually quite disappointed because DI could have been a big, big game...It really could have been if it were more original..
|
What would be your opinion if Sony released God of War 2 EX. Which was a game roughtly the size of GOW2 which played just like GOW2 but had completly different levels and a completly different setting.
Wouldn't you consider that a big game?
Originality is overrated. I like innovation as much as anybody... hell probably more then most people... however a good game is just a good game. You shouldn't really bash a game for not being original unless the game and it's developers specifically state it's trying to be original OR it's a franchise that has just been beaten into the ground.
|
God of War III is supposed to be longer. AND - In terms of size, if you mean SCALE then GoW3 is much much bigger than II.
Combat is basically the same, otherwise the fans wouldn't like it would it ? In addition, you can switch weapons on the fly, and the new weapons are much more different than the previous games. Also rideable creatures is a first in the series. Magic is supposed to be differently used and there are battle on moving titans. Also the Icaras ascenntion levels are completely new. Thats all that has been revealed upto now, by release I can probably list more.
Obviously
Unfortunately, DI is just good, or average - when it could have been AMAZING !
Have you even played GoW ? If you played GoW and play the DI demo you will realize what exactly I mean. Its kinda pathetic actually. The devs just went out there with one ambition - create a game similar to GoW.. "I mean what could possibly go wrong..GoW is awesome, if we copy it our game is bound to be awesome too." Wrong Visceral. WRONG.
|
I have played GOW. Haven't played DI though.
You didn't really read my question though. My point wasn't about GOW3. My point was is another GOW2 was released. Would it really be any worse then the previous GOW2?
|
I suggest you play the DI demo, you'll see what I mean.
|
So your saying... If Sony released a game just like GOW2 that was equal in quality you would think it was inferior to GOW2 because it had something new. That's all i'm asking.
Since your only complaint this thread was "they didn't try anything new."
|
Nope. My complaint is that they shamelessly ripped off God of War's combat system. Its SO similar.
Only the game is supposed to be repetitive, has mediocre voice acting, repetetive and lacks the huge scale that God of War has.
If they were a bit original in their approach to the combat system, it would have been better.
|
Yes, that's my point... exactly.
Your main complaint is "It's not from Sony."
It has nothing to do with the combat system... but who UTILIZED the combat system.
|
Wrong answer...read the second line of the previous post... You're accusing me of being a fanboy..
