--OkeyDokey-- said:
Kasz216 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Kasz216 said:
You don't seem to be getting it. Eurogamer wouldn't have the same opinion of "epicness" were this game called GOW3.
There is a reason why companies pay money to color margarine yellow even though it doesn't change the taste any.
|
See, God of War is awesome.
DI copied God of War, but didn't meet the high standards of the series.
Hence DI got burned by reviewers..
|
No DI got burned because it wasn't GOW despite being an exact copy. pretty much every review i've seen says something along the lines of "it copies everything from GOW yet for some reason isn't nearly as fun." You give people two identical wines, but change the bottles and they will report a dinstict difference in taste. |
I expect more from you. Being a complete ripoff doesn't make it equal in quality.
|
No, but that's basically the quotes that were written... and even inferior products can outshine superior ones with the right branding.
Most people would enjoy DI more if they called it GOW: Something and reskinned everyone to look like Greek characters... this is my point.
The quality of DI is irrelevant since all the negativity that was on it since it's announcement has made the game somewhat toxic to reviewers giving it a high score.
Good/bad it was never going to get AAA scores due to it's branding and due to all the pre-negativity.
