whatever on 03 December 2007
| Bursche said: Wow biased much? "In the long, hot autumn of 2000, the world was shocked by the contempt for democracy shown by the Republican Party. They knew their man had lost the popular vote to Al Gore by half a million votes. They knew the majority of voters in Florida itself had pulled a lever for Gore. But they fought -- amid the confetti of hanging chads -- to stop the state's votes being counted, and to ensure that the Supreme Court imposed George W. Bush on the nation." This right here is where I totally blew off this man's opinion. Our political system is based off of the electoral votes, not popular. People need to realize this. This is how it has always been and most likely always will be. He makes it seem like the Republicans stole the election when all they did was try not to waste everyone's time in Florida by recounting everyone's votes. It was stupid to hold a recount. |
HUH? Waisting everyones time? Are you kidding me? This is generally considered the most important position in the world right now. You think it would be a waste of time to take an extra week to get it right? Especially since the winner wouldn't take office for another 2 months. Talk about biased. The ONLY reason the republicans didn't want a recount was because there was a strong possiblity they might lose.
As for the current situation, if California votes to have its electoral votes split, then so be it. A state has every right to decide how to divide its electoral votes. It may favor the republicans, but it is not a constitutional issue.
