IGN editors share their take on Mass Effect 2.

[Fame_Mcswagg]

--OkeyDokey-- said:

Fame_Mcswagg said:

--OkeyDokey-- said:

Fame_Mcswagg said:

--OkeyDokey-- said:

leatherhat said:
The first one was much better, more memorable characters and better battle system.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Are you being serious?

I agree with him so far granted I only put in about 5 hours, so far I prefer the first one

So tell me, how is the battle system better in the first one and how are the characters more memorable?

well for starters I play as an adept, in ME2 you can cast the powers far to fast, So far I just been running through blasting people with warp meeting no resistance it seems. it made the battle system far to easy. Maybe I will get used to the weapon system but it seems sorta lame to me right now, It just doesn't feel like an rpg meaning you don't see how much expirenece you earn after every enemy defeated, like the first one. As far as characters I dont really know how I feel about the ones in part 2 yet the story just feel weaker for some reason. There are other things but thats the main reason why I prefer the first one so far. That all could change when I put more time in though.

Well, if you're only 5 hours in you probably haven't even got Jack and Grunt yet. And everyone else seems to be complaining that Adepts are weak compared to ME1.

no not really its the exact opposite. They are way strong in ME2. What difference would it make if I got those characters. I didn't comment on the characters being better in ME1. I said the story seemed weaker and I prefered the old battle system.....